taas.jokin.fi

Vibe Coding: A Deeper Look at the Future of Software Development

Where coding meets creativity, and AI meets intention.

Software development is changing. Slowly, subtly—but unmistakably. A new mindset is emerging, one that doesn’t obsess over semicolons or syntax trees, but instead focuses on intuition, clarity, and collaboration with AI. It’s called vibe coding, and while the name sounds casual, the implications are anything but.

Vibe coding isn’t just about writing code with AI—it’s about thinking differently, designing with intent, and becoming a better communicator of ideas. It’s not a shortcut for lazy devs or a gimmick for beginners. It’s a response to the growing power of tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, and other generative systems.

And it might just be the start of a paradigm shift.

Let’s dive deeper into what vibe coding really offers—and what it demands in return.

Clear Thought Is the New Hard Skill

One of the most striking observations from the Hackaday comments is this:

“Going through the thought process well enough to articulate it for an AI… is like 90% of the mental effort of designing a program anyway.”

This hits hard because it’s true. Working with AI doesn’t absolve you from understanding the problem. If anything, it forces you to clarify your thinking more than ever.

In traditional coding, you might be able to start building and figure things out along the way. With AI, that luxury fades. You have to define your intent clearly: inputs, outputs, behaviors, edge cases, constraints. The more vague your prompt, the more generic—and often wrong—your results.

So vibe coding demands a new kind of discipline: precision in communication. You’re not just coding—you’re explaining, describing, directing.

If you can’t explain your problem to an AI, you probably don’t understand it well enough yourself.

Repetition Is Automated, But Depth Isn’t

Let’s be honest: not all coding is fun. A lot of it is repetitive, thankless, and easily automated—boilerplate setup, scaffolding, glue code, API wrappers, etc.

AI is brilliant at this. And that’s a good thing.

“Still removes the repetitive boredom of much of the actual typing of coding.”

But here’s the deeper truth: vibe coding doesn’t remove the need for depth. It amplifies the parts of the job that machines still can’t handle well—naming things clearly, designing robust architectures, thinking about failure modes, or weighing trade-offs between patterns.

It’s tempting to let AI fill in the blanks. But unless you review the output critically—unless you understand what it’s doing—you risk creating fragile or insecure systems without even realizing it.

So yes, vibe coding saves you time. But only if you’re still willing to dig deep when it matters.

Lowering the Barrier… But Not the Bar

One of vibe coding’s greatest promises is accessibility. You don’t need to master an entire language or ecosystem to start creating. A motivated person with an idea and some persistence can build working software today using AI-assisted tools.

That’s incredible. That’s empowering.

But it’s also easy to overpromise.

Generative AI can produce plausible-looking code, but not always correct or secure code. It’s great for getting started, but beginners still need guardrails, guidance, and review. Otherwise, the result is code that works—until it doesn’t.

So while vibe coding invites more people into the conversation, it doesn’t eliminate the need for learning. It reshapes what that learning looks like. Less about syntax memorization—more about system thinking, testing, debugging, and iteration.

Think of it as a new literacy. Not “how to write code,” but “how to work with code

Prototyping Is Faster—But So Are Mistakes

Rapid iteration is where vibe coding truly shines.

You can go from idea to prototype in minutes. Want a basic dashboard? A REST API? A new UI component? AI can scaffold that almost instantly.

This speed is a gift—but also a trap.

The faster you can build, the easier it is to skip over architecture, testing, and long-term thinking. You end up chasing demos instead of designing systems. If you’re not careful, you’ll create a pile of technical debt in record time.

That said, when used responsibly, vibe coding is a superpower. It’s especially useful for early-stage experimentation, learning by doing, and exploring variations without a huge upfront cost.

Speed is not the enemy—recklessness is. And vibe coding asks you to know the difference.

You’re Not Coding—You’re Directing

Here’s where vibe coding really shifts the developer’s identity.

You’re no longer the person handcrafting every line. You’re the director—the creative lead, the architect, the quality controller. You shape the AI’s output through prompts, feedback, edits, and iteration.

This doesn’t mean you give up control. In fact, it requires more awareness, more judgment. You’re making high-level calls: what should this module do? How should this system scale? What’s the best way to handle errors?

The AI is your assistant. Your intern. Sometimes your overconfident coworker. You still need to guide it.

This kind of partnership is powerful. But it only works if you know how to lead.

Final Thoughts: The Real Vibe

Vibe coding isn’t about “letting AI do your job.” It’s about redefining what the job is.

It’s not easier—it’s just different. It asks for clarity over cleverness, vision over verbosity, and systems thinking over syntax mastery.

Used well, it can unlock creative freedom, accelerate development, and bring more people into the world of software. Used poorly, it can become a fast lane to spaghetti code and shallow understanding.

The real skill isn’t in typing code—it’s in thinking clearly, communicating precisely, and shaping good systems.

In the end, vibe coding is about making ideas real—faster, smarter, and with a little help from your digital co-pilot.

Reblog

Reblog via jouni

Oon pohtinut miksi käytetään termiä "face-to-face" eli suomalaisittain silleen kossupaukun jälkeen lausuttu "feistufeis" – sen sijaan että sanottaisiin "kasvotusten" tai "naamatusten" (joka on ihan pöljä kans).

Onko "kasvotusten" liian voimakas sana? Haluaisin tavata sinut kasvotusten? Niin, että kuinka lähellä kasvojen tulisi olla kun tavataan?

Yritetäänkö "facetoface":lla jotenkin pehmittää asiaa? Ja onko siinä sellainen pieni negaatio, ettei ehkä sit kuitenkaan haluttais tavata kasvotusten?